I’ve given up on the news yet again. Occasionally I do this, because overload is not good for my “mental health”.
However this time I did it for slightly different reasons. I’m not sure if anyone else has noticed, but the level of public manipulation seems to have risen exponentially since the Southport riots. I’m not just talking about the crude tactics of sending the police round to have a chat with anyone even marginally on the right, or jailing someone who uses wrong think hurty speech, but a much more subtle form of coercion that accompanies it. Think “brexity books”, for instance. That one off the cuff comment shows just how indoctrinated the police are with antagonism toward anyone who didn’t vote Remain; as if it had anything to do with them.
I don’t think Reform’s win in the local elections helped in this context. It just made the cabal that runs the country double down even more and as a consequence put out many more and varied distractions.
Let’s have a look at some examples. The news on tv; choose your station it makes no difference. This is supposed to be news relevant to the British people, their way of life and what’s been going on here. There have always been some international news items, usually at the end of the bulletin, but they were never the bulk of the programme.
Ever since Covid statistics were dramatically and luridly reported daily, causing the majority of people to become terrified of going out of their front door; it has been seized upon as a cast iron way to manipulate the public through emotion and get them to align with the current thinking and not ask awkward questions about what’s going on under their noses.
Instead of Covid, nearly all news bulletins start with the current figures for deaths in Gaza, accompanied by lurid screenshots of rubble, crying children and frantic hospital doctors demanding that Israel stop destroying their people. This often goes on for at least ten minutes and is very difficult to watch. I’m sure I’ve seen several of the children in other lurid shots before, which makes me wonder if our squeaky clean reporters are using recycled footage and are guilty of “artistic license”.
No, I have not suddenly discovered my inner psychopath, and I do genuinely feel for the ordinary people of Gaza, but this does not help.
Apparently, watching such footage has already sent poor Gary Lineker mad to the point where considering the elimination of the Jewish state seems like a viable option, along with a group of other celebs whose toxic empathy seems to be growing by the day.
I find it hard to believe that the movers and shakers in the world care anything for the Palestinians. The fastest way to end the conflict would have been to join together to get rid of Hamas, and then negotiate a two state settlement with a legitimate Palestinian government, after elections had been held.
Indeed, just lately, Peter Tatchell was arrested for trying to point out that Hamas are every bit as violent to their own people as the Israelis, and not by accident, but by deliberately beating up and in some cases killing, Palestinians who protest against their rule.
I don’t think anyone wants to see the Palestinians punished in this way, but as long as Hamas are seen as the legitimate representatives of the country, it will go on.
Through judiciously selective reporting in the west, Hamas have now become shorthand for the wishes of the Palestinian people, even though said people have been trying to get rid of them for years.
No one lets a bunch of thugs build bases under their schools and hospitals and have first dibs on any aid that gets through unless they are afraid of the consequences of saying no. So how is giving them a free pass, ever going to free Palestine? Did Afghanistan teach people nothing? Probably not as that was a while ago and the circus of virtuous outrage has moved on.
The reporting mantra seems to be, agree the direction you want people to go in and ramp up the emotional triggering to the extent that everyone is so hyped, they give in and stop trying to look at the subtleties of the situation.
The result is that those on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides are so entrenched and ossified in their views, it’s like Brexit all over again. People have actually ended friendships going back many years and refused to speak to family members due to this Middle Eastern war. That’s how psy ops works! Take something thousands of miles, or in the case of Covid thousands of levels, from the everyday life of the general public that they have absolutely no control over and use it to fragment their existence if they don’t “get with the message”.
You do have to ask yourself why, if there are children dying in horrible avoidable wars and other disaster situations all over the world, is this particular war promoted as so much worse and, what are the other reasons that make pushing it to the front of the world so necessary.
It then leads you to think, what else is being promoted in this way and what don’t I know that I should?
Another thing. Advertisements. You would be forgiven for thinking that the country had a minority rather than majority white population. I’m not sure there are enough Afro Caribbean people in this country for every white woman to have one as a partner or best friend. Would this be about socialising us into accepting that the typical English person on the “Clapham omnibus”, is no longer white? After all, if children can be taught that the country has always been populated by black people even as far back as Stonehenge, then history has been successfully rewritten.
A more subtle form of “normalisation” through this advertising is the fact that they all have the lifestyle and mannerisms of the white English middle class when on t.v., but with African tribal hairdos. Talk to any famous black person and they will express pride in their African heritage, and dislike of the people in the country that have enabled them to climb to the top of this new class system. Confusing isn’t it? I would have thought they would want to express all their inner African on t.v. and not their inner Hyacinth Bucket. I wonder if that is really what is meant by white privilege? That even though they have been given more protected characteristics than you can shake a pointy stick at, and it’s nigh on illegal not to let them have any job they want; none of it counts for as much as a row of beans to them because they are still not white. In that case they are creating their own prejudice against themselves. It also explains why the most virulent of them still see the lowest of the white working class as still having “privilege “. I mean really, who cares what colour you are as long as you are the right person at the right time. Smart black and Asian people realise this and it’s a pleasure to know them. It would also explain why the agitators are so keen to get rid of Northern Europeans. Once we are replaced, they can pretend we never existed except in small toxic groups. Then, many Hollywood films can be made about how the brave black people saved Britain and the world from the white disease, so they won’t ever be “triggered “again.
Let’s look at politics.
Sigh. Very disappointed in Starmer. He’s given up even trying to fool the people and that’s not playing the game.
Maybe because his approach is so crude, he isn’t up to it and so relies on ignorance, brute force and stock phrases to get his way.
TheChagos islands are a prime example of this. Good grief, he’s not even listening to the people who live there and want to remain British. They will get independence from us and like it, or there will be trouble. No one must interrupt his view of freedom from British colonialism, even if it means things get worse instead of better.
Listen to any political chat, be it a politician or a journalist, and you will see subtle variations in the language. It will contain certain words and phrases that are creeping into everyday speech which of course are never challenged.
For example: “the majority of the world”, has changed to “the world majority”. This often said in the context of things happening in this country which are prejudicial to white people. It is meant to imply that the government is on the side of the majority and democracy is not dead, because the majority in the world are not white. Therefore, anything that is good for white people must be oppressive to the majority and needs dealing with.
Another one is “international law says”, and of course being international law, it can’t be broken or ignored. The implication is that to do so would bring down the wrath of God and destroy the country.
This of course is blatantly untrue, as quite a few countries ignore international laws, but we are not supposed to see that. If this is ever pointed out, it is twisted to say that abiding by these laws is a mark of a civilised society and we should set an example by taking the moral high ground.
One of my favourites is “bce”, that is before common experience. This has been a favourite of the intelligentsia for several years now, as quoting “bc”, before Christ, was deemed an insult to other religions.
I’ve no idea who thought up that one, but they must have done it when extremely bored and looking for something to do.
There are many others sentences and phrases that not only separate white societies from non-whites, but also seek to fragment white people from each other; “trans women are women” being the most commonly used, along with all the newly discovered “phobias”, which are spat at the public if they speak in the none government approved way.
In fact the most recent example of this moralistic creep is the response to Lucy Connolly’s jail sentence by her supporters no less.
Almost everyone who spoke for her prefaced their defence by stating that they knew what she said was wrong, and in some cases vile. It’s no wonder her appeal failed. If the general belief is that she is in the wrong, even though they don’t believe the sentence was fair, then it emboldens the judiciary to stick to its guns. If it had been said that although some people might take offence at what she wrote; in this country, that does not mean you can jail someone for having an opinion that upsets you, the outcome may have been different.
The idea that all immigrants are frail misunderstood victims who will be brutally treated by the majority of white Britons unless protected by increasing legislation and government largesse has seeped deep into our society. So much so that like damp in a house, once it gets past a certain point, it’s cheaper to pull the house down and build something else.
One of the reasons I took a media rest, was a little experiment I tried on myself. I wrote down the words Lucy used in her comment as though I was going to post them.
The result was, I immediately felt a combination of guilt and fear, in case anyone found out what I’d written and drew attention to it. I had not realised how much self-censoring and mistrust of others who might judge one’s speech and actions I had imbibed.
It made me wonder what other people had unconsciously started to believe and fear without being aware of it.
Society works on trust. Trust that we are all equal before our peers and the law. Without this, the centre cannot hold and we get what we’ve got now; a multi culti hell hole where the “winners and losers” are defined by government largesse and the personal beliefs of judges.
That is not what I would call a healthy society, let alone a free one. It may surprise the cabal, but Britain cannot exist as a concept without its white population. The landmass that is the island exists no matter who lives on it; but if white history and culture is rewritten or degraded, then it is no longer Britain and needs to be called something else; by whichever cultural faction eventually wins the fight and claims the land.
